Category: Environmental Incident Unit

Fracking a Dead Cow.

No Comments

Is Fracking a clean and green energy that’s the question? A uk government department are trying to pass it off as such whilst also contributing to the impoverishment of local people.

I had a call from Mr X the other day. He said an old school friend of his was telling him “Fracking was a jolly good clean way of extracting oil,” but that he himself (Mr X that is) had “missed a putt playing golf near Blackpool earlier this summer when the Earth shook, and evidently this was caused by an earthquake triggered by a local fracking site.” As a consequence he no longer felt “quite so sure about fracking, and wanted me to look into it.” He’d also heard of some colleagues in government classifying fracking as “a green energy” so that intrigued him too.

Of course I promised to do so, and the next morning whilst packing my rain coat and booking a ticket to glorious Lancashire, a dossier arrived on my desk (ok browser not desk, but desk is more poetic): It came from some investigative journalists* and shared the story of the Mapuche people in Argentina.

Now the region they lived in for generations is the “Vaca Muerta,” (Spanish for dead cow) and areas of this had already been fracked by Argentina’s own oil company, YPF, but then in 2013 a further area including a specific piece of land the Mapuche understood to be fully recognised as theirs, was opened up by the government for fracking by international companies. These included Chevron, Shell and Pan American Energy (a subsidiary of BP). Protesters against this were met with tear gas, and the day after it was signed, a special structure that the Mapuche people had set up on their own land to monitor infringement and the oil companies’ activities, was burnt down in what was described as a “deliberate incident.”

The article shares that Fracking produces “large quantities of toxic biproduct.”  At one site in the region half a million litres of toxic waste arrives at the site every day from nearby extraction sites. The conditions in which this waste is stored risk contaminating local water supplies and violate local regulations being too close both to habitation. One site in the region oil leaked for 36 hours across the land, to the extent it was visible with satellite images. The increase in activities from Chevron and others has also led to sustained loss of vegetation irreversibly damaging the homelands of the Mapuche people and with it their traditional way of life.  

Ok Mr X I think we can answer this one, Fracking cannot be claimed as a clean way to extract oil.

But what about this other claim that it’s a green energy?

Well I think even I can answer that one. Fracking is used to extract fossil fuels which are both a limited resource (so not renewable) and also responsible for the vast majority of man made carbon dioxide in the environment, and climate scientists suggests the best place for fossil fuels given the climate emergency is to remain IN THE GROUND.

So where and which GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT does the claim that it is green come from? Well yet again a dossier crossed my desk, in this case from Jillian Ambrose** sharing a Friend’s of the Earth report that has uncovered that:

“The UK is planning to invest in Argentina’s controversial oil shale industry using a £1bn export finance deal intended to support green energy, according to government documents seen by the Guardian.

UK Export Finance, the government’s foreign credit agency, promised in 2017 to offer loans totalling £1bn to help UK companies export their expertise in “infrastructure, green energy and healthcare” to invest in Argentina’s economy.

Instead official records, released through a freedom of information request, have revealed the government’s plan to prioritise support for major oil companies, including Shell and BP, which are fracking in Argentina’s vast Vaca Muerta shale heartlands…..

Tony Bosworth, a campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said: “With the world hurtling towards catastrophic climate change, and parliament declaring a climate emergency, it’s outrageous that the UK government is continuing to back huge fossil fuel developments abroad.”

Separate records, also uncovered by Friends of the Earth, revealed that there had been no fewer than 13 meetings between the UK and oil companies operating in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta hydrocarbon reservoir since the beginning of last year…..

There have been no meetings with renewable energy companies, according to the records.”

So it would seem Mr X’s government colleagues in “Export finance” are the one’s trying to pass off fracking and shale gas as green so they can frack a dead cow in an area i guess where they and other colleagues don’t play golf.

EcoAction: could be worth letting the department of export and finance and others know we have seen their little ruse to pass off fracking as green and are unimpressed!

* Nicholas Williams, Marina Costa and Katie Lamborn, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/video/2019/oct/14/how-fracking-is-taking-its-toll-on-argentinas-indigenous-people-video

** https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/22/uk-to-use-1bn-meant-for-green-energy-to-support-fracking-in-argentina

Met Office Warning: Gail Approaching!!

No Comments

The Met Office have put out a warning of yet another major Gale approaching. This one being called Gail Bradbrook.

Like so many at this time, its power is exponentially increased due to global warming and climate emergency.

Gail herself, in dark colours and handcuffs, held a cool front about the truth of this in contrast to the hot air coming out of Westminister, saying if they’d speak the truth about climate and commit to zero carbon by 2025 she’d calm down, though adding for her, its increasingly about creating a truer democracy and establishing a binding citizen’s assembly with both the teeth and power to guide us to a more just and equitable way. 

Likely Factors: increasing the Gail: witnessing bail outs for the bankers and the weight of austerity then being put on the greater majority of people. Deep love of the Earth and people.+

Possible solutions: Who wants to solve Gail Bradbrook anyway? Though i don’t necessarily agree with everything she says or all her actions, overall we need more of her forthright down to earth truth and feisty standing for justice. If the authorities want to qwell the storm, they need to truly serve all the people and our planet home, not just a rich elite, and bring their actions in line with what’s needed.  Join the call for a CLIMATE and ecological emergency CITIZEN’S ASSEMBLY as well as forming and participating in people’s assembl;ies which include council of our earth: Let’s find a better way together.

STOLEN FUTURES

No Comments

A number of futures have recently gone missing. There are reports of others being seriously diminished.

Have you checked if you still have yours? Or your children or grandchildren theirs??

Have you lost your future or part of your possible future too?
You could add your picture or your children’s picture here:

Likely Culprits: Ignorance of our interconnectedness and dependence on all of life. Greed & aggressive predatory capitalism leading to massive species loss and climate breakdown.

Note to Investigator: already some have suggested these are symptoms of a wider problem…

Possible solutions: This is a shared catastrophe – we need to find a better way together. Learn to listen to the Earth, study, principles such as permaculture (earth care, people care, fair share), self examine and engage with growing a better life together. Put the children’s future and the home and wider earth family we depend on at centre

And sign up to stop ecocide:https://www.stopecocide.earth

War – the biggest crime against the Planet and All its children

No Comments

In War, crimes against the planet soar exponentially….think of all the extra carbon spent by all that machinery poncing about, posturing and shooting at each other, and then there’s the weapons:

Bush and Blair having waded into Iraq to “save” its people on the FALSE pretext of weapons of mass destruction, having already lied to their own people, used Uranium tipped missiles, leading not just to massive immediate loss of life but long term birth defects amongst Iraqi’s…”thanks for saving us guys, not.”

Although it was little publicised more recently Trump dropped with seeming glee “the mother of all bombs” in Afghanisthan…their people as guinea pigs to this experiment in a continued action totally out of proportion (like the earlier invasion according to a distinguished british diplomat) to anything the country has done. (“Proportional response” is what is needed according to this former British Ambassador to Israel, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan – Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles KCMG LVOE in his 2018 talk entitled “what the jihadis really want.”).

A thousand wrongs do not make a right…and when they also exponentially add to climate emergency they are very far from saving anyone.

Likely Culprits: Ignorance, greed, an unwillingness self examine

Possible solutions: Engaging in shadow integration work. As a Jungian Elder (Julian David) suggested, the only real evil is when we put it outside of ourselves, it is often then that the most evil acts are committed claiming to be good, in an effort to extinguish it outside ourselves, yet in doing so revealing it inside ourselves.

Though on a local level it can be necessary to restrain another from causing harm, the real work is as Carl Jung says, if “someone is brave enough,” to “withdraw all their projections….they (then) have become a serious problem to themselves…as they are now unable to say that they do this or that, they are wrong, and they must be fought against….Such a person knows that whatever is wrong in the world is in themselves, and if they only learn to deal with their own shadow they have done something real for the world” “Psychology and Religion” (1938). In CW 11: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P.140

From wikipedia in relation to uranium tipped missiles it is shared that though:

The U.S. Department of Defense claims that no human cancer of any type has been seen as a result of exposure to either natural or depleted uranium.[87] Militaries have long had risk-reduction procedures for their troops to follow,[88] and studies are in consistent agreement that veterans who used DU-enhanced munitions have not suffered, so far, from an increased risk of cancer (see the Gulf War and Balkans sections below). The effects of DU on civilian populations are, however, a topic of intense and ongoing controversy.

in contrast:

As early as 1997, British Army doctors warned the Ministry of Defence that exposure to depleted uranium increased the risk of developing lung, lymph and brain cancer, and recommended a series of safety precautions.[89] According to a report issued summarizing the advice of the doctors, “Inhalation of insoluble uranium dioxide dust will lead to accumulation in the lungs with very slow clearance—if any. … Although chemical toxicity is low, there may be localised radiation damage of the lung leading to cancer.” The report warns that “All personnel … should be aware that uranium dust inhalation carries a long-term risk … [the dust] has been shown to increase the risks of developing lung, lymph and brain cancers.”[89] In 2003, the Royal Society called, again, for urgent attention to be paid to the possible health and environmental impact of depleted uranium, and added its backing to the United Nations Environment Programme‘s call for a scientific assessment of sites struck with depleted uranium.[90] In early 2004, the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service attributed birth defect claims from a February 1991 Gulf War combat veteran to depleted uranium poisoning.[91][92] Also, a 2005 epidemiology review concluded: “In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU.”[13] Studies using cultured cells and laboratory rodents continue to suggest the possibility of leukemogenicgeneticreproductive, and neurological effects from chronic exposure.[8]

And in Iraq:

Iraqi population

Since 2001, medical personnel at the Basra hospital in southern Iraq have reported a sharp increase in the incidence of child leukemia and genetic malformation among babies born in the decade following the Gulf War. Iraqi doctors attributed these malformations to possible long-term effects of DU, an opinion that was echoed by several newspapers.[85][139][140][141] In 2004, Iraq had the highest mortality rate due to leukemia of any country.[142][143] In 2003, the Royal Society called for Western militaries to disclose where and how much DU they had used in Iraq so that rigorous, and hopefully conclusive, studies could be undertaken out in affected areas.[144] The International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons (ICBUW) likewise urged that an epidemiological study be made in the Basra region, as asked for by Iraqi doctors,[145] but no peer-reviewed study has yet been undertaken in Basra.

A medical survey, “CancerInfant Mortality and Birth Sex Ratio in Fallujah, Iraq 2005–2009″ published in July 2010, states that the “…increases in cancer and birth defects…are alarmingly high” and that infant mortality 2009/2010 has reached 13.6%. The group compares the dramatic increase, five years after wartime exposure in 2004, with the lymphoma that Italian peacekeepers[146] developed after the Balkan wars and the increased cancer risk in certain parts of Sweden because of the Chernobyl fallout. The origin and time of introduction of the carcinogenic agent causing the genetic stress the group will address in a separate report.[147] The report mentions depleted uranium as one “potentially relevant exposure” but makes no conclusions on the source.

Four studies in the second half of 2012—one of which described the people of Fallujah as having “the highest rate of genetic damage in any population ever studied”—renewed calls for the US and UK to investigate the possible links between their military assault on the city in 2004 and the explosion in deformities, cancers, and other serious health problems.[148] Despite the known use of depleted uranium by allied forces, no depleted uranium has been found in soil samples taken from Fallujah.[149]

“Inactivists”

No Comments

An interesting case this one – whilst the planet has slowly been tail spinning into a human induced 6th mass extinction, Inactavists have been on the increase – evidently not a problem for those who want us to “obey, consume, be silent, die.” Indeed some say they encourage it with “weapons of mass distraction,” but more of an issue for those of us who’d like decent conditions for life to be part of our children’s inheritance.

We called in an experienced unit – Phantom 23 and a half, in a bid to try to unstick a number of inactivists glued to their tv screens, and even younger inactivists glued to games on their phones. The unit said this is much tougher job than that XR lot and themselves had to wear blinkers so as not to be distracted by the drama and exposed flesh of that vital programme at this time: love island…

Are you having trouble peeling away from tv and other screens? Do you feel it could be an addiction or are you in denial?

photo: Sandra Dubosq

Don’t let it stop you going out, you could always wear your screen like this man does, but also you could brave going out without it, and why not invite others bring your creative minds together in relation to what is really needed at this time – together we can support the Great Turning – away from an extractive economy to an earth loving one.

Likely Culprits: the media, pollution dulling brains, depression – ungrieved grief

Note to Investigator: 1. sometimes the news is just a distraction. 2. Joanna Macy suggests apathy is actually rooted in fear of suffering.

Possible solutions:  shake yourself a wake, attend a grief tending, sing dance, learn to listen to the earth and ways of working together eg: peoples assermblies with the children’s fire at the centre : Let’s find a better way together.

here also is a link to some grief tending offerings: https://grieftending.org

And the Elders said: “Time to Break this Law. It doesn’t serve the children.”

No Comments

As we look around for new ways that will help us in the transition from empire to earth serving community, we can learn a great deal from the stories and ways of cultures that live/have lived more harmoniously with the earth than our current destructive one.

Though I have been unable to fully track the root of this story (having personally heard it only orally from a mixed blood native american couple), the message in it still can serve well. 

In essence among these particular people, when laws were made they were recorded  on or in relation to an arrow (or stick if you prefer). All laws were reviewed every seven years, and thoroughly examined to see  if they actually served life, served life in terms of not just children now, but also seven generations hence (this meant all children,  for humans are not just islands but depend on so much else).

If the law was found not be serving the children, then the arrow/stick was broken. If a new law was to be made it could be made bearing in mind the failings of the previous one, and not be passed unless these were satisfactorily remedied.  

“here this is a better one…”

Examples of law arrows appropriate to be broken in our time, are those that enshrine corporations rights as if they are people…

These it turns out are criminal laws that rob the majority of people and the planet to line the pockets of an already rich few.

So this is a law stick that should be Broken.